You are welcome to say that as early as when the election of the party chairman was stalemate, there were rumors within the Blue Camp that Zhu Lilun and Zhong Xiaoping had a tacit understanding . The case of returning to the Kuomintang and recalling also involved both parties supporting a certain Zhu family to participate in the primary election of the members of the Central Committee of Wanhua District. If these rumors are true, doesn't it mean that the personal political interests of Zhu Lilun and Zhong Xiaoping are fundamentally above the public interests of voters, casting a shadow over the so-called "legitimacy" of the recall. In addition, the false and false rate of the second-order joint signature of Lin
Changzuo's recall case is as high as 30%, and popular database this time, the 6,738 supplementary copies still have a false and false rate of 22%. Although the number has broken through the legal threshold, the quality is fundamentally confusing and indiscriminate. The reason for this phenomenon is that anyone with a discerning eye can see that this is the plagiarism of the initiators' plagiarism. Zhong Xiaoping sued the North City Chairman of the Kuomintang for accusing the black box of the primary election Photo Credit:
Chuosha Taipei City Councilor Zhong Xiaoping Furthermore, the initiators’ reasons for dismissal are dazzling, but after careful observation, it can be found that most of these reasons are subjective emotional catharsis or hatred reactions of these people, rather than objective and rational claims. For example, Liao Jibin, the representative of the leader of Zhongzheng District, was dissatisfied, saying that he had lived in Zhongzheng District for 50 years, and he had never seen a legislator so arrogant and irresponsible, " It is a shame for the city to have such a legislator. ".